In a landmark judgment delivered on April 17, 2025, the Supreme Court of India affirmed that peaceful protests by homebuyers expressing grievances against builders do not constitute defamation. This decision underscores the constitutional right to free speech and protects consumers from being silenced through legal intimidation.
Background of the Case
The case involved a group of homebuyers who displayed a non-abusive banner outside a developer’s building, voicing concerns over construction delays and quality issues. The builder, M/s A. Surti Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal defamation complaint under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code. Initially, the Bombay High Court upheld the issuance of summons against the homebuyers. However, the Supreme Court overturned this decision, emphasizing that the protest was conducted in a “mild and temperate language” and did not cross into defamatory territory .
Supreme Court’s Observations
A bench comprising Justices K.V. Viswanathan and N. Kotiswar Singh highlighted that:
“A right to protest peacefully without falling foul of the law is a corresponding right, which the consumers ought to possess just as the seller enjoys his right to commercial speech.”
The Court further stated that portraying such peaceful protests as criminal offenses, without the necessary legal ingredients, amounts to a clear abuse of the judicial process and should be curtailed at the outset.
Implications of the Ruling
This judgment sets a significant precedent for consumer rights in India, particularly in the real estate sector, where delays and deficiencies often lead to prolonged disputes. It affirms that:
- Consumers have the right to publicly highlight their grievances, provided they do so truthfully and respectfully.
- Businesses cannot suppress dissent through criminal defamation proceedings unless clear malice and falsehood are demonstrated.
Broader Context
This ruling aligns with the Supreme Court’s recent efforts to protect homebuyers’ rights. In a separate case, the Court directed that no coercive action be taken against homebuyers in the National Capital Region by banks or builders regarding EMI payments until possession of their flats is delivered.
By reinforcing the right to peaceful protest, the Supreme Court has sent a clear message that consumer voices cannot be stifled through legal intimidation, thereby strengthening the democratic fabric of the nation.
Expert in RERA & Consumer Matters, Co-operative Scty Matters,
Deem Conveyance, Family Matters, and Property Disputes.
Human and Civil Rights Campaigner
President Citizens Justice Forum https://citizensjusticeforum.in
YouTube Channel https://tinyurl.com/CitizensJusticeForum
WhatsApp +91 99877 43676 +91 8928372392