IBC Moratorium Does Not Provide Immunity from Consumer Law Penalties Supreme Court
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has clarified that an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) does
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court has clarified that an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) does
The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (MahaREAT) recently overturned a MahaRERA decision that dismissed the complaints of eight homebuyers involved in the ‘One Park Avenue’
The Supreme Court has reinforced the principle that an arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction cannot be contested after a statement of defense is submitted. A bench comprising
The Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (comprising Justice Shriram R. Jagtap and Shrikant M. Deshpande) has ruled that a housing society owning land and authorizing
Summary of the Case The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, led by Justice Ram Surat Maurya and Mr. Bharatkumar Pandya, ruled that while various medical
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, chaired by Mr. Subhash Chandra and AVM J. Rajendra, ruled that refunded amounts should be paid with interest from
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, led by Mr. Subhash Chandra and Dr. Sadhna Shanker, ruled that compensation should both reimburse for losses and restore
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, led by Justice Ram Surat Maurya and Mr. Bharatkumar Pandya, ruled that insurers cannot unilaterally alter policy coverage during
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), chaired by Dr. Inder Jit Singh, has found Raheja Developers responsible for failing to provide timely service. The
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, chaired by Dr. Inder Jit Singh, ruled that intermediaries are more than mere facilitators; they earn commissions and thus