Case Overview The complainant filed a complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 against a tour operator who organized a tour to
Case Summary The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, chaired by Justice A.P. Sahi and Dr. Inder Jit Singh, ruled that although trading in shares is
Case Summary The Ernakulam District Commission, led by Shri. D.B. Binu, Shri. V. Ramachandran, and Smt. Sreevidhia T.N., determined that overcharging a customer and refusing
The Ernakulam District Commission, chaired by Shri D.B. Binu, Shri V. Ramachandran, and Smt. Sreevidhia T.N., ruled that the bank is responsible for safeguarding the
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, led by Justice Ram Surat Maurya and Mr. Bharatkumar Pandya, ruled that builders must deliver a completed unit along
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, chaired by Mr. Subhash Chandra and Dr. Sadhna Shanker, found Vatika Limited responsible for a deficiency in service due
The Ernakulam District Commission, led by Shri. D.B. Binu, Shri. V. Ramachandran, and Smt. Sreevidhia T.N., held Federal Bank accountable for a deficiency in service.
The Ernakulam District Commission, led by Shri. D.B. Binu, Shri. V. Ramachandran, and Smt. Sreevidhia T.N., ruled that in consumer cases, the burden of proof
In a recent judgment on August 28, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that when the termination of a contractual appointment carries a stigma, the principles of
The Registrar of Companies (RoC) Pune has levied a penalty of ₹5.03 lakh on Clairvoyant India Private Limited and its directors for not forming a